| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
Tyrrax Thorrk
Amarr
Umbra Congregatio
Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate
   |
Posted - 2008.02.13 02:54:00 -
[1]
I wonder if that's what happened to The Kadeshi too..
I'd suggest escalating to a senior GM, but this is something all alliances have to put up with, and it's not as if undocumented features in EVE are rare or anything so dunno if you'll have any luck with that.
Another question is if you decide not to reform the alliance what happens to your 1 billion isk tournament deposit ;O
|
Tyrrax Thorrk
Amarr
Umbra Congregatio
Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate
|
Posted - 2008.02.13 23:35:00 -
[2]
Hey you're back  What happened ?
|
Tyrrax Thorrk
Amarr
Umbra Congregatio
Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate
|
Posted - 2008.02.14 03:19:00 -
[3]
 Originally by: Phoeb3
I highlighted the last portion, by the woring in this portion of the text am I to assume that the money is automatically deducted from the executors alliance wallet?
You can assume that if you want to, an argument can be made that it's implied, but they don't actually say so, so assuming that would be pretty stupid.
I'd say the "It is the executor's responsibilty" is the more pertinent part of that qyote.
Also I wasn't hijacking the thread you jackass forum alt, The Kadeshi alliance was disbanded a few days ago too, seems likely that it'd be for a similar reason.
|
Tyrrax Thorrk
Amarr
Umbra Congregatio
Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate
|
Posted - 2008.02.20 21:01:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Sicariidae
The points I brought up in my post were supposed to expose the inconsistancy in your dealings with paying clients either individually or as a group. The comment about bribing was an example because it wasn't "STATED" in the official rules, not becuase we wanted to bribe another team.
Rules didn't state it wasn't allowed so why the HECK (ffs kieron :\) are you complaining about them saying it is allowed, if they'd said it wasn't allowed then you'd have something to complain about.
Quote:
No offence HUN's I/WE have nothing against you guys, I only mentioned your situation because again it appeared as preferential treatment. Then it was mentioned about Cruel Intentions getting bumped out of first reserve because HUN were the defending champs and expressed thier desire to compete: sure makes it look like rules were bent in order to satisfy your group.
Yes they got preferential treatment, no it's not fair to Cruel Intentions, but hey life's a ***** and then you die.
Good call really, it's a better tournament because of their unfair ruling and that's more important (in my opinion).
|
Tyrrax Thorrk
Amarr
Umbra Congregatio
Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate
|
Posted - 2008.02.22 07:21:00 -
[5]
CCP said, ok first come first get, no exceptions, these are the rules, if people drop out reserves get in in the order they apply.
Then the champions fail to get in and people complain, one team drops out, first reserves get in (not HUN Reloaded), CCP reverse it because it was a misunderstanding.
Now another team gets removed from tourney by CCP (rather unfairly at that since they could've easily recreated alliance in time)
CCP decide that HUN Reloaded get to advance to the front of the line..
You don't see anything wrong with that Victor ? 
like I said I think it's good for the tournament, but saying it's fair or consistent is utter rot.
|
| |
|